network attribute|range
---|---
total nodes|151.0 - 291.0
total edges|1032.0 - 3182.0
network density|0.059 - 0.137
average degree|10.979 - 21.869
degree heterogeneity|0.731 - 0.925
degree assortativity|0.177 - 0.232
average betweenness centrality (unweighted)|0.005 - 0.009
average betweenness centrality (weighted)|0.005 - 0.009
average clustering coefficient (unweighted)|0.659 - 0.788
average clustering coefficient (weighted)|0.052 - 0.179
Newman modularity|0.355 - 0.473
maximum modularity|0.739 - 0.838
relative modularity|0.452 - 0.564
group cohesion|0.567 - 0.671
network diameter|0.567 - 0.671
**Study description**|**value**
Species|*Tursiops truncatus*
Taxonomic class|Mammalia
Population type|free-ranging
Geographical location|Cedar Key, Florida, USA
Data collection technique|survey scan
Interaction type|spatial proximity
Definition of interaction|Interactions characterized by prey capture or persistent incidents of prey searching as indicated by long dives or specialized feeding behaviours with direction shifts between surfacings.
Edge weight type|frequency
Total duration of data collection|124 days
Time resolution of data collection (within a day)|
Time span of data collection (within a day)|5min
Note|Four networks: an overall network that does not take behaviour into account, and the socialize network, the travel network and the forage network that correspond to their respective behaviours.
**Citation** | Gazda, Stefanie, et al. "The importance of delineating <br> networks by activity type in bottlenose dolphins <br> (Tursiops truncatus) in Cedar Key, Florida." Royal <br> Society open science 2.3 (2015): 140263.